jump to navigation

Domino & Exchange Co-Existence April 30, 2010

Posted by systoolssoftware in Data Migration, Domino, Domino Server, Email Migration, Exchange Server.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

A good link on Domino and Exchange co-existence

http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Improving_Coexistence_between_Lotus_NotesDomino_and_Microsoft_Exchange.html

Folders not getting migrated in SysTools Export Notes October 28, 2009

Posted by systoolssoftware in Data Conversion, Data Migration, Domino, Domino Server, Exchange Server, Export Notes, Lotus Notes, NSF, NSF to PST, Outlook, Outlook Express, PST.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Knowledge Base Article: 17190-2-107

 Symptoms:

 While migrating the Lotus Notes mailbox using SysTools Export Notes some folders hierarchy may not migrated properly to Microsoft Outlook.

 Cause:

 Lotus Notes NSF file may be corrupted for the particular folder hierarchy.    

 Workaround:

 Follow the below steps

  1.  Open the NSF file in Lotus Notes Client.
  2. Rename the folder which is not getting migrated.
  3. Close the NSF file.
  4. Close the Lotus Notes Client.
  5. Launch SysTools Export Notes and perform the conversion.

 

Applies To:

Domino Server 8.5 Performance Released September 14, 2009

Posted by systoolssoftware in Domino, Domino Server, Lotus Notes.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

IBM releases the performance metrics for Domino Server 8.5. Overall they found it to improve greatly compare to Domino Server 8.0 in terms of

  • I/O reductions.
  • Reductions in disk operations per second
  • Reductions in disk bytes transferred per second.
  • Processor utilization

Please check the link below for details

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/lotus/library/domino85-performance/

MS Exchange V/s Lotus Notes for Fortune 100 companies August 7, 2009

Posted by systoolssoftware in Domino, Domino Server, Exchange Server, Export Notes, Lotus Notes, Outlook.
Tags: , , , , ,
1 comment so far

Found this presentation where there is head to head comparision between organisation which have Lotus Notes or Microsoft Exchange deployed.

Check out SysTools Software Export Notes Migration Tool “Export Notes” which migrates Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook PST file.

Domino Server V/s Exchange July 4, 2009

Posted by systoolssoftware in Domino, Domino Server, Exchange Server, Export Notes, Lotus Notes, MS Office, Outlook, Outlook Express.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

The below link provides a detailed comparision between MS Exchange Server & Domino Server

http://www.itcomparison.com/Mail/Exchange2k7vslotus8/Exchange2k7vslotus8.htm

Though it failed to provide any comparision on performance.

Domino Server 8.5 Performance Benchmarks July 3, 2009

Posted by systoolssoftware in Domino, Domino Server, Lotus Notes.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

IBM has released the performance benchmarks for the Domino Server 8.5. The following variations were tried for the benchmarks

  1. Windows 2003 Server
  2. Linux
  3. IBM
  4. AIX
  5. Solaris

The product is tried with 1000, 2000,3000 and 4000 simultaneous users. Please check the link below for the complete report

Domino Server 8.5 Performance Benchmark Report

Domino Roaming Users June 14, 2009

Posted by systoolssoftware in Domino, Domino Server.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

One of the very good feature to highligh in Domino Server is Roaming users. Please check the link below

http://www.uwindsor.ca/units/its/helpdesk/itshd_faq.nsf/inTocNetscape/49D2CC39416193BC8525700000622D37

Nice post on the same topic.

RAID Configuration for Domino Server June 10, 2009

Posted by systoolssoftware in 21141317, Deployment, Domino Server, Export Notes, Hardware, Lotus Notes, RAID.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

Considering today’s requirement and availability of better hardware the question of which RAID level should be used for Domino can be answered very quickly.

Before we go ahead let’s know more about various RAID level (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID)

  • RAID 0 (striped disks) distributes data across several disks in a way that gives improved speed and no lost capacity, but all data on all disks will be lost if any one disk fails. Although such an array has no actual redundancy, it is customary to call it RAID 0.
  • RAID 1 (mirrored settings/disks) duplicates data across every disk in the array, providing full redundancy. Two (or more) disks each store exactly the same data, at the same time, and at all times. Data is not lost as long as one disk survives. Total capacity of the array equals the capacity of the smallest disk in the array. At any given instant, the contents of each disk in the array are identical to that of every other disk in the array.
  • RAID 5 (striped disks with parity) combines three or more disks in a way that protects data against loss of any one disk; the storage capacity of the array is reduced by one disk.
  • RAID 6 (striped disks with dual parity) (less common) can recover from the loss of two disks.
  • RAID 10 (or 1+0) uses both striping and mirroring. “01″ or “0+1″ is sometimes distinguished from “10″ or “1+0″: a striped set of mirrored subsets and a mirrored set of striped subsets are both valid, but distinct, configurations.

Considering RAID 10 is better in Write compare to RAID 5 and RAID 5 is better than RAID 10 for READ (http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/billg/archive/2007/06/18/RAID-10-vs.-RAID-5-Performance.aspx) the decision to choose should depend upon the following factors

  1. How much is allocated for the deployment?
  2. If the number of WRITES on Domino server is more than RAID 10 is recomended.
  3. Go with mix strategy i.e. have the Domino Data directory on higher RAID level and the program files on lower RAID level.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.